CONTENT

This website floodofgenesis.com states the following, "Why not allow scientific evaluations of differing theories of geology,." Our analyzers analyzed that the website said " Without dogmatic stipulations of conformity to uniformitarianism? Criticisms of the belief in literal interpretation of the Flood of." The Website also stated " Genesis depend on the philosophy of naturalism commonly. Portrayed as science in some developed nations. Wrong with using an approach that is popular with many modern. Believe what you will, but that popular approach to. Criticizing the creationist interpretation is not scientific; most." The website's header had flood as the most important search term. It was followed by Genesis, Noah, and pterosaurs which isn't as ranked as highly as flood. The next words they used was book. geology was also included but will not be seen by search engines.